Skip to content
  • About Journal
  • Archive of issues from 1951–2018
  • Search an article
  • Čeština
  • English
4/2016 (MONO) -
Výzkumná studie Research Paper

Page: 477-494
Author: Šeďová, K.
Key words: teaching communication, dialogic teaching, teacher training, critically reflective interviews

Annotation:

In this study we analyse data gathered through reflective interviews with teachers as part of a training programme focused on changing the communication behaviour of teachers. We pose the question of the nature of the content of reflective interviews and whether there is a correspondence between this content and subsequent change in teaching. We show that this is a selective correspondence, because the teacher incorporates into his teaching only selectively chosen suggestions from the interviews. At the same time, by the incorporation of the change a new problem typically emerges as an unanticipated consequence and this becomes the subject of critical reflection in a next step. We also show how the reflective interviews are formed by the different professional visions of teachers and researchers and how despite these different professional perspectives, a harmony can be achieved.


Článek ke stažení v češtině [PDF]:

Download the article in English [PDF]:

References:

Adey, P. (2006). A model for professional development of teachers thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 49–56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2005.07.002

Akbari, R. (2007); Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practice in L2. System, 35(2), 192–207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.12.008

Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.

Berson, E., Borko, H., Million, S., Khachatryan, E., & Glennon, K. (2015). Practice what you teach: A video-based practicum model of professional development for elementary science teachers. Orbis scholae, 9(2), 35–53.

Beuchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: issues emerging form a review of current literature. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 123–141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.982525

Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2011). Dialogic teaching: talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25(6), 515–534.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861

Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2015). Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in Teaching of English, 49(3), 272–296.

Burns, C., & Myhil, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education 34(1), 35–50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000183115

Collin, S., Karnseti, T. (2011). The collective dimension of reflective practice: The how and why. Reflective Practice, 12(4), 569–581.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.590346

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers´professional development: Towards better conceptualisation and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Gayle, B. M., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (2006). How effective are teacher-initiated classroom questions in enhancing student learning? In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes (279–293). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Grossman, P. L., Smagorinski, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1–29.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/444230

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U

Chinn, C. A., Anderson R. C., & Waggoner. M. A. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378–411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3

Janík, T., et al. (2011). Video v učitelském vzdělávání. Brno: Paido.

Janík, T. (2013). Od reformy kurikula k produktivní kultuře vyučování a učení. Pedagogická orientace, 23(5), 634–663.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-5-634

Korthagen, F., Kessels, J., Kosters, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels T. (2011). Jak spojit teorii s praxí. Didaktika realistického vzdělávání učitelů. Brno: Paido.

Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028004004

Kumpulainen, K., & Lipponen, L. (2010). Productive interaction as agentic participation in dialogic enquiry. Educational Dialogues. Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, 1(4), 48–63.

Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2014). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. London: Routledge.

Mena Marcos, J. J., Sánchez, E., & Tillema, H. (2009). Teacher reflection on action: what is said (in research) and what is done (in teaching). Reflective Practice, 10(2), 191–204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623940902786206

Mena Marcos, J. J., Sánchez, E., & Tillema, H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: what is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21–36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.538269

Minaříková, E., Píšová, M., Janík, T., & Uličná, K. (2015). Video clubs: EFL teachers´ selective attention before and after. Orbis scholae, 9(2), 55–75.

Molinari, L., & C. Mameli. (2015). Triadické interakce ve výukové komunikaci. Studia paedagogica, 20(3), 9–28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/SP2015-3-2

Noffke, S., & Brennan, M. (2005). The dimensions of reflection. A conceptual and contextual analysis. International Journal of Progressive Education, 1(3), 58–78.

Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue. understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, London: Teachers College Press.

Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. (2001). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Cela Research Report Number 14005. New York: The National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013) Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073

Parker, M., & Hurry, J. (2007). Teachers' use of questioning and modelling comprehension skills in primary classrooms. Educational Review 59(3), 299–314.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131910701427298

Pehmer, A. K., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2015). Fostering and scaffolding student engagement in productive classroom discourse: Teachers´ practice changes and reflections in light of teachers professional development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 12–27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.05.001

Pimentel, S. D., & McNeill, K. L. (2013). Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers´ beliefs. Science Education, 97(3), 367–394.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.21061

Sfard A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. New York: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944

Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Colestock, A. (2008). Professional vision in action: An exploratory study. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 27–46.

Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Moore, C., Jackson, A. Y., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach. Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 8–24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487103260067

Smagorinsky, P., Shelton, S. A., & Moore, C. (2015). The role of reflexion in developing eupraxis ine learning to teach English. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(4), 25–308.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1067146

Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2011). Computer-assisted systematic observation of classroom discourse & interaction: Technical report on the systematic discourse analysis component of the Towards Dialogue study. Working papers in Urban Language & Literacies. London: King's College London.

Šedová, K., Sedláček, M., & Švaříček, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14–25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005

Šedová, K., Švaříček, R., Sedláček, M., & Šalamounová, Z. (2014). On the way to dialogic teaching: Action research as a means to change classroom discourse. Studia paedagogica, 19(4), 9–43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/SP2014-4-2

Šedová, K., Švaříček, R., & Šalamounová, Z. (2012). Komunikace ve školní třídě. Praha: Portál.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wells, G., & Arauz, M. R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3



Časopis Pedagogika ISSN 0031-3815 (Print), ISSN 2336-2189 (Online)
Spravovat souhlas s cookies
Abychom poskytli co nejlepší služby, používáme k ukládání a/nebo přístupu k informacím o zařízení, technologie jako jsou soubory cookies. Souhlas s těmito technologiemi nám umožní zpracovávat údaje, jako je chování při procházení nebo jedinečná ID na tomto webu. Nesouhlas nebo odvolání souhlasu může nepříznivě ovlivnit určité vlastnosti a funkce.
Funkční Always active
Technické uložení nebo přístup je nezbytně nutný pro legitimní účel umožnění použití konkrétní služby, kterou si odběratel nebo uživatel výslovně vyžádal, nebo pouze za účelem provedení přenosu sdělení prostřednictvím sítě elektronických komunikací.
Preferences
Technické uložení nebo přístup je nezbytný pro legitimní účel ukládání preferencí, které nejsou požadovány odběratelem nebo uživatelem.
Statistiky
Technické uložení nebo přístup, který se používá výhradně pro statistické účely. Technické uložení nebo přístup, který se používá výhradně pro anonymní statistické účely. Bez předvolání, dobrovolného plnění ze strany vašeho Poskytovatele internetových služeb nebo dalších záznamů od třetí strany nelze informace, uložené nebo získané pouze pro tento účel, obvykle použít k vaší identifikaci.
Marketing
Technické uložení nebo přístup je nutný k vytvoření uživatelských profilů za účelem zasílání reklamy nebo sledování uživatele na webových stránkách nebo několika webových stránkách pro podobné marketingové účely.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Zobrazit předvolby
{title} {title} {title}